Can you please name a few?
Happy Hacking, Gaurav Vaish ttp://gallery.mastergaurav.net -------------------------------------- On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:11:50 -0500, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there's plenty of big sites using tomcat. They just don't say it. I > know several sites getting millions of page views a day using tomcat > just fine. > > peter > > > > > On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:49:32 +0530, Gaurav Vaish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Rémy, > > > > Thanks for your response. > > > > In anycase, is there a list of people / companies using Tomcat > > (standalone or with Apache)? > > > > Happy Hacking, > > Gaurav Vaish > > http://gallery.mastergaurav.net > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:51:22 +0200, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gaurav Vaish wrote: > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > > > > I am looking for some good case-study on Tomcat loadtest and benchmarking. > > > > > > > > It may or may not be with mod_jk(2) however a study with the > > > >following paramters would be useful: > > > > > > > > - JDK Version > > > > - Tomcat version > > > > - OS (with version and SPs) > > > > - Apache Version (if not standalone) > > > > - Concurrent Users (Threads) > > > > - Response Time > > > > > > > > The problem is that we have a e-Learning application running on > > > >Tomcat 4.x (planning to migrate to 5.x) which faced severe problems > > > >when put on production server. Stress testing in labs were passed > > > >gracefully, however it gives several issues with around 500 concurrent > > > >users on the production server. > > > > > > > > In anycase, which would be more scalable (load) - standalone Tomcat > > > >or with Apache/mod_jk? > > > > > > > > > > > > The details of the production server are: > > > > > > > > - Red Hat Enterprise Server 9.0 > > > > - Kernel 2.4.9 > > > > - JDK 1.4.2 (Sun JDK) > > > > - Tomcat 4.0 (Standalone) > > > > - 2048MB RAM > > > > - 4-Processor CPU (2GHz each), Intel 386 > > > > > > > > > > > Tomcat 5.0 is faster than 4.1 which is faster than 4.0, but we don't > > > have any numbers to give you. > > > Feel free to contribute results. > > > > > > Rémy > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
