Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,

Cause the API still in the stage of developement I'd like to make some
renaiming, cause we'll be stuck into for a while.

1. ajp_msg_get/peek_byte => ajp_msg_get/peek_uint8
to be consistent with other data type, or change the ajp_msg_append from
uint8 to byte.

+1


2. ajp_parse_type => ajp_msg_get_type Makes more sense, thought.

No, ajp_msg_parse_type is better because we don't "read" the message but only peeek its type.



3. ajp_parse_headers => ajp_parse_header think that we receive only on header message per request.


+0 : I am quite bad in naming routines! ajp_get_header would be better IMHO ;-)



Any objections? MT.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to