> -----Original Message----- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > The only 2 JNI models that actually work are jk2 "protocol > > marshalling, pass only byte[]" and eclipse swt "small simple calls > > with mostly int and byte[] params" > > > All that is cool, but what you propose looks a lot like JK 2 (JMX > dynamic features, support for many webservers, etc), and we know that > almost no developer understands it anymore. This clashes head on with > the "it has to be simple" requirement: how do you expect the > issue to be > solved ? > > This is the point about dropping server portability, among > other things. > Sorry to say it aloud, but for new developments I don't care > about IIS > (it should die) nor Apache 1.3, which are the two other servers that > matter. To support these, we have mod_jk 1.2 (and too bad if people > don't get the extra features).
Ouch! I know you guys want to move on, and so far the ideas look great. Just remember that some users move very, very, very slowly, especially big companies. Hopefully something will popout of all of this and there can be an end to the confusion that is mod_jk->mod_webapp->mod_jk2 Greg PS Agreed that IIS can rot, but then some colleagues might read this, so it's great, honest! > > Rémy > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
