Sorry Tim missed that post, but agree that something simpler would be great
IMHO.

There is a learning cliff with mod_jk2 that many I feel try to climb, and
don't make it.  They then tomcat gives them a bad taste.

KISS - the easier it is to do a simple config (and at the same time have
flexibility to do a complicated one) the better.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 July 2004 15:25
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Some JK2 ideas v.2
> 
> 
> I wasn't thinking of a dependency on mod_rewrite, but a way 
> to to configure 
> JK based on common data structures that may be set by mod_rewrite.
> 
> Its actually a restatement of this:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=108987495224170&w=2
> 
> 
> -Tim
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Would do you think a dependancy on rewrite is a good idea, 
> as AFAIK it is
> > not part of the core build apache 2 - but I could be very 
> wrong as I only
> > use 1.3.x
> > 
> > Agreed overall that making jk2 either part of the standard, 
> easier to build
> > and configure would be a great step forward IMHO.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to