You are abolutely correct (but not from my point of view). Did you ever think that some core Java config stuff has to be in the event log?
Did you ever tried to make the Tomcat registry configurable? Why is then so hard to accept the JK2 as a independent project? MT. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ignacio J. Ortega > > > > I think you are mixing here 2 different concerns, wheter or > not to use a platformn specific configuration mechanism, aka > registry and I'm +1 on get rid of the registry, (for the sake > of completness, it can be done now by placing a ini file at > the same place of the dll itslf and with the same name as the > dll, but i agree it's cumbersome) > > And something slightly different is to not use platform > specific logging mechanisms, and i'm -1 on this.. I like the > way it's now, everything comming from apache at one log, and > everything comming from IIS at the event log, i never use jk2 > log for instance.. > > Saludos, > Ignacio J. Ortega > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
