- Possibly require JDK 1.5 (cleaner code, annotations, integrated JMX and JMX
remote, etc)
I have made prototype for mx4J JSR 160 support it looks very nice. Can't we refactor the ServerLifecycleListener also? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29259
No, that listener needs to go IMO. This listener is useless in the end (for this branch): this is done at the VM level much more cleanly, and the VM also provides tons of runtime statistics that nobody will want to live without. I'll rethink my position if J2SE 5 (I'm learning ;) ) turns out bad somehow, but I don't think the core VM is a big rewrite, so I expect it to be stable. I'll start using it soon for my builds and testing, and I'll see how it goes.
Though I also really like Java 5's [yep, another neat numbering change from Sun :-)] built-MBeans for JVM monitoring, I'd *really* like to see a JSR 160 solution in Tomcat that works in Java 1.4.x and Java 1.5 (aka 5).
Is this the plan/hope? At a high level it does not look too nasty to do this....
-- Jess Holle
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
