The test needs to be updated to test for the correct
behaviour now that the bug is fixed. :-)

BTW, I did post a proposed patch which fixes this bug
and improves performance of the JDBCStore.  No one
has replied.

Regards,

Glenn

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:37:08PM -0700, Amy Roh wrote:
> Bill Barker wrote:
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 6:07 PM
> >Subject: wrong timeIdel value in StandardSession
> >
> >
> >
> >>The following patch causes regression where sessions don't expire when it
> >>should.  I have a test app that does refresh every 70 sec.  When I set
> >>timeout to 2 minute - the session *never* expires.
> >>
> >
> >
> >I see the change to be not so much a regression as a bug-fix :).  Your app
> >is accessing the session every 70 sec, so the session is never idle for the
> >required 2 min to allow it to expire.
> 
> I see on Remy's commit that "Ths patch needs to be tested for possible 
> regressions".  The test jsp actually checks if the session expired after 
> timeout and alerts when refreshed.  I am attaching the jsp.
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >>cvs diff -r 1.26 -r 1.27 StandardSession.java
> >>
> >>587c587
> >><             int timeIdle = (int) ((timeNow - lastAccessedTime) / 1000L);
> >>---
> >>
> >>>           int timeIdle = (int) ((timeNow - thisAccessedTime) / 1000L);
> 
> 
> I have added some debugging statements and found the following.
> 
> setMaxInactiveInterval 120
> timeIdle now 0
> timeIdle before 0
> timeIdle now 36
> timeIdle before 36
> timeIdle now 116
> timeIdle before 186
> WOULD HAVE EXPIRED WITH OLD TIMEIDLE
> timeIdle now 70
> timeIdle before 70
> timeIdle now 0
> timeIdle before 70
> timeIdle now 26
> timeIdle before 96
> timeIdle now 70
> timeIdle before 140
> WOULD HAVE EXPIRED WITH OLD TIMEIDLE
> timeIdle now 0
> timeIdle before 70
> timeIdle now 16
> timeIdle before 86
> timeIdle now 70
> timeIdle before 140
> WOULD HAVE EXPIRED WITH OLD TIMEIDLE
> timeIdle now 0
> timeIdle before 70
> timeIdle now 6
> timeIdle before 76
> timeIdle now 66
> timeIdle before 137
> WOULD HAVE EXPIRED WITH OLD TIMEIDLE
> timeIdle now 70
> timeIdle before 140
> WOULD HAVE EXPIRED WITH OLD TIMEIDLE
> timeIdle now 0
> timeIdle before 70
> timeIdle now 56
> timeIdle before 127
> WOULD HAVE EXPIRED WITH OLD TIMEIDLE
> 
> Let me know what you think....
> 
> Thanks,
> Amy
> 
> 
> >>
> >>I propose to revert the patch.
> >
> >
> >I'm -1 on reverting unless you can explain why you think that the previous
> >behavior is correct wrt the spec.  And, no, the fact that this bug has been
> >in every version of Tomcat back to at least 3.2.x isn't good enough ;-).
> >
> >
> >
> >>Thanks,
> >>Amy
> >>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as 
> >the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED 
> >and CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, 
> >copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this 
> >communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then 
> >delete all copies of this message and any attachments.
> >
> >In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent 
> >through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive 
> >information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal 
> >identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) 
> >e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen             [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder    |
MOREnet System Programming               |  * if iz ina coment.      |
Missouri Research and Education Network  |  */                       |
----------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to