DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27704>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27704 Result of request.getServletPath() wrong in case JSP inside jsp-property-group [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Major |Normal Component|Unknown |Jasper ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-16 13:32 ------- I completely disagree with your two bug reports. Either they are invalid or the specification is broken. The main problem is this sentence: "If at least one <jsp-propertygroup> contains the most specific matching URL pattern, the resource is considered to be a JSP file". This is clearly extremely bad behavior when using wildcard patterns. I am going to veto any attempt to fix these last two "bugs" (with bug 27664) until I am explained why the specification is not broken. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
