Hello,

Due to the increased volume of SPAM this mailbox has been closed.

Please contact us via http://www.directxtras.com/ContactUS.asp

We apology for the inconvenience.

Best Regards,
--
The DirectXtras Team
---------------------------------------------------------------------
DirectXtras - Xtra Power for Director and Authorware -
              http://www.directxtras.com
Sites with something to say - http://www.SpeaksForItself.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Your message reads:

Received: from mail.apache.org (unverified [208.185.179.12]) by mail2.intermedia.net
 (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.6) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:20:29 -0800
Received: (qmail 6550 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2004 02:20:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 6525 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2004 02:20:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2004 02:20:11 -0000
Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Aq123-0000b3-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:20:19 +0100
Received: from adsl-63-202-82-219.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.202.82.219])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon Feb  9 02:20:19 2004
Received: from cmanolache by adsl-63-202-82-219.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with local 
(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon Feb  9 02:20:19 2004
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uri runtime info - avoid nameless entries
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:10:31 -0800
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-63-202-82-219.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 
Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

NormW wrote:
> Good morning All.
> The fact that the row (without even a 'name' value) appears in the URI
> runtime table in /jkstatus suggests that it must be an object (bean?) of
> type 'uri' because that is a requirement of the loop. Hence something is
> permitting the creation of an unitialised uri object [zero perhaps, since it
> is the first element in the table] and all this change will do is mask it
> from display in /jkstatus. Of course once the cause of the problem is
> determined then this patch will not have a detrimental effect.

If I remember correctly, this object is created by the initialization 
process of apache - there is a callback for each <Location> and <Host>, 
but also one callback for the top-level server, with no location or host.

I think it can be avoided, don't remember any use for this.

Costin


> Norm
> 
> 
>>Hi all,
>>no comments yet to this??
>>Guenter.
>>
>>
>>>in mod_jk2, if invoked by the /jkstatus page,
>>>jk2_worker_status_displayRuntimeType() displays always a nameless /
>>>useless first line below the uri runtime info;
>>>I'm asking me what entry that vould be, and if it is the right way to
>>>suppress displaying it, or dig for what it is?
>>>can perhaps someone enlighten me?
>>
>>>======================================================
>>>--- jk_worker_status.c.origTue Feb 03 00:21:34 2004
>>>+++ jk_worker_status.c      Wed Feb 04 22:03:24 2004
>>>@@ -282,6 +282,10 @@
>>>         if( mbean==NULL || mbean->getAttributeInfo==NULL )
>>>             continue;
>>
>>>+        /* Don't display nameless */
>>>+        if( mbean->localName == NULL || (strlen(mbean->localName) ==
> 
> 0) )
> 
>>>+            continue;
>>>+
>>>         if( mbean->getAttribute == NULL )
>>>             continue;
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to