Could someone explain what's the (current) difference between our webdav servlet and slide ? Looking at the site, slide seems to have far more features ( which is not necesarily good ). Is there a good point of maintaining 2 webdav solutions ? Could we just bundle slide ( if we want tomcat to be webdav-enabled ?
Slide does a lot. It seems some people are interested in a plain simple WebDAV solution, which would simply add FTP-like feature, and nothing more. The WebDAV servlet is rather small, so I think it does that, and is relatively useful.
My employer uses it as well, so I'd like to keep it in ;)
Rémy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
