Stefanos Karasavvidis wrote:
This is getting ridiculous.
Both sides have strong arguments.
I hadn't thought about this issue until tomcat changed it's behaviour, and maybe the Sun folks didn't do it as well.

This should really be clarified within the specification (and I hope they come up with a solution that allows us to continue using GET parameters as we were used to as this is an absolute necessity... maybe by introducing a new method or a second parameter).

Although I do not expect too much, I 've just sent a comment to JSR53 and JSR154

Sorry, nobody answered my previous question. What is the strong argument for breaking backward compatibility ?


The RFC 2396 (URI syntax) in part "2.1 URI and non-ASCII characters" states that:

   However, there is currently
   no provision within the generic URI syntax to accomplish this
   identification. An individual URI scheme may require a single
   charset, define a default charset, or provide a way to indicate the
   charset used.

   It is expected that a systematic treatment of character encoding
   within URI will be developed as a future modification of this
   specification.


It means that URL character encoding is not defined by standards. So the only problem which I see is that Tomcat suddenly breaks the de facto standard used for last ten years and tries to stop application to use GET parameters.

Martin
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Supercomputing Center Brno             Martin Kuba
Institute of Computer Science    email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Masaryk University             http://www.ics.muni.cz/~makub/
Botanicka 68a, 60200 Brno, CZ     mobil: +420-603-533775
--------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature



Reply via email to