Wonder why questions on jk2 often never get a response. Are the relevant developers not active on this list ?
Even cc-ing the developers who are credited in the relevant source code doesnt help !! --Roshan > -----Original Message----- > From: NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:48 PM > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: mod_jk2 .. is 0 a valid child_id ? > > > mod_jk2 creates this error long entry each time apache starts up... > > > [Mon Dec 15 15:20:17 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 0 > > > The relevant code printing the error is in function > jk2_child_init() in > mod_jk2.c > > static void jk2_child_init(apr_pool_t *pconf, server_rec *s) > { > //... > > if( workerEnv->childId <= 0 ) > env->l->jkLog(env, env->l, JK_LOG_ERROR, "mod_jk > child init %d > %d\n", > workerEnv->was_initialized, > workerEnv->childId ); > } > //... > } > > > Here 0 is assumed to be invalud childID. But other parts of > the code (in the > > same function) seem to find the childID>=0 to be fine .... > > if (workerEnv->childId >= 0) { > workerEnv->childGeneration = > ap_scoreboard_image->parent[workerEnv->childId].generation; > ++ap_scoreboard_image->parent[workerEnv->childId].generation; > } > > ... > > /* Restore the process generation */ > if (workerEnv->childId >= 0) { > ap_scoreboard_image->parent[workerEnv->childId].generation = > workerEnv->childGeneration; > } > > > I am not too clear about the logic ...however it seems like > something is > not right if thar error is being printed each time apache comes up. > > -- Roshan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
