Does this pretty much says that jk2 is now not recommended? (At least until it gets more cleanup) So I can update the FAQ.
No, this means there's one connector on the Java side, so the number was useless.
We could rename that to AJP connector, BTW. I almost did it, but left JK as the name in the end.
I believe it would be better to use the protocol name (AJP) as the connector name, so that it is not tied to any native code or another subproject's name. I can make the change.
Rémy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm 2003/12/10 04:38:01
Modified: webapps/docs/config project.xml
Added: webapps/docs/config jk.xml
Removed: webapps/docs/config jk2.xml
Log:
- Remove confusion: all references to JK 2 are gone, and replaced with JK.
This should clear some confusion (hopefully, and we can focus on mod_jk 1
vs mod_jk2).
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
