DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25120>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25120 docBase in config file not ignored when war attribute provided using catalina ant deploy tasks ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-01 22:17 ------- I understand how to work around it. I just don't see why it is necessary to have to work around it? You can call this "splitting hairs", but many bugs/enhancement requests are, by definition, "splitting hairs". The functionality doesn't quite meet expectations, therefore a bug/enhancement request. Anyway... There is already the ability to override the "docBase" attribute in the config file by providing a "war" attribute. If I provide the "localWar" attribute, I provide it for the same reason as I did with the "war" attribute. So, why not the same behavior of ignoring the "docBase" in the config file? The thing is, I have stuff where I do require the config file (loggers, connection pools, overriding environment variables, etc...). I also currently have a single config file with the docBase set to a default of "myapp.war" which is only used when actually uploading a file to a server. I now have to create a separate config file whith the only difference being the lack of a "docBase" attribute. Again, this seems inconsistent and unnecessary. I won't reopen this if you really think it is invalid, but it is most certainly inconsistent behavior and at least that is noted here. Jake --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
