DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17579>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17579 "port" in "jk_channel_socket_private" should be "int" instead of "short" ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-23 18:50 ------- This is specially "bad" since according to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document on IP port numbers assignments, http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers, there are 3 ranges of ports: * The Well Known Ports : 0 - 1023 * The Registered Ports : 1024 - 49151 * The Dynamic and/or Private Ports : 49152 - 65535 Therefore, using a short does not even covers the "Registered Ports" range when on a x86-based processor (excluding ia64). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
