----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:05 PM Subject: Re: Connector ObjectName includes address
> Jan Luehe wrote: > > > > >>>Bill Barker wrote: > >>> > >>>>>Currently, connector objectname includes address in this format: > >>>>> > >>>>>domain:type=Connector,port=8080,address=0.0.0.0. > >>>>> > >>>>>This causes a problem when IPV6 addresses are used since IPV6 addresses > >>>>>include colons. The javax.management.ObjectName doesn't allow to have > >>>>>colon character in it and this causes > >>>>>javax.management.MalformedObjectNameException: ObjectName: invalid > >>>>>character ':' in value part of property. > >>>>> > >>>>>I propose to exclude address as connector objectname property since > >>>>>port number alone should keep the objectnames unique. > >>>> > >>>>What about the case where I have several V-Hosts, each with it's own > >>>>Connector listening on port 80? > >>> > >>>This seems a possible use case, but is that really useful ? I would > >>>always put the connector at the engine level, personally. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Regardless of where you put it, you still have one connector per V-Host > >> IP address. > > > > > > I may be totally off here, but in the most common cases, all your > > domain names (one for each V-Host) will map to the same IP address, in > > which case you cannot have more than one Connector listening on the > > same port (if you do that, you'll get a java.net.BindException when > > starting the 2nd and so forth Connector). > > Not quite :-) > > It is common to have multiple IP addresses - either by using multiple > ethernet cards, or by using ifconfig aliases. That's how virtual hosting > worked in the old days, and it is still used if you want to support > old clients ( or command line / other tools that don't include Host ). > For vhost - it is probably valid to have different engines or configs for > different vhosts. > If the port happens to be 443 instead of 80, then that is still the way it works :-). You can't used NamedVirtualHosts with SSL. > > I think it would be a bad idea to use only the port ( which will be 80 for > most hosts anyway ). > > If mangling the IPv6 address is not a solution, then we'll need some unique > name or something. > I'm surprised that this thread has lasted as long as it has. I'd just assumed that Amy would do something like replacing ':' in the address with, say, '%3a', and be done with it. I'm all for mangling the IPv6 address. > Costin > > > > You can only have more than one Connector listening on the same port > > when they're listening on different IP addresses on the same server. > > > > This is the case we need to resolve, right? > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
