Bill,
thank you so much (so far :-)

4.1.28 starts up nicely and answers me - even if I only get half of the start page 
(index.jsp),
and even if I cannot execute the "XML" example ... and so on.
But at least this damned ebcdic-line-separator-problem is done away with

Anna

PS:  I submitted a mail  about a functioning (?) tomcat on os/390 in marist's open-mvs 
mailing list
where a lot of people ask about tomcat; I suppose I may forward this 4.1.28-link to 
them? 

 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: Re: TOMCAT-fix for os/390??


> Try http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/v4.1.28-alpha/.  The 'alpha'
> is just because it is still in it's evaluation stage.  It's likely to
> graduate to at least beta (if not 'stable').  However, your ability to test
> it on an os/390 system makes you particularly valuable to the developers, so
> I hope that you will try it out :).
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 12:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Re: TOMCAT-fix for os/390??
> 
> 
> > Well well ...  being a simpleton (=user) I don't quite manage to manage
> cvs ...
> > I would love to install tomcat 4.1.28 (having 4.1.27), bit I cannot find
> such a distribution.
> > So what it boils down to if I cannot get 4.1.28 is: install rls 6 BETA -
> does it go well with JDK 1.3?
> >
> > thank you very much for your help
> > Anna
> > >
> > > Von: Dirk Verbeeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Datum: 2003/10/09 Do PM 10:53:59 GMT+02:00
> > > An: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Betreff: Re: TOMCAT-fix for os/390??
> > >
> > > Hi Anna
> > >
> > > I don't use tomcat on os390 but by reading you problem I suspect your
> > > problem is solved in cvs, you need at least revision 1.16.2.1
> > >
> <http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http
> 11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalOutputBuffer.java?rev=1.16.2.1>
> > > or 1.18
> > >
> <http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http
> 11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalOutputBuffer.java?rev=1.18>
> > > of the following file:
> > >
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalOutputBuffer.java
> > >
> > > Releases including this fix are TOMCAT_5_0_13
> > >
> <http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org
> /apache/coyote/http11/InternalOutputBuffer.java?only_with_tag=TOMCAT_5_0_13>
> ,
> > > TOMCAT_5_0_12
> > >
> <http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org
> /apache/coyote/http11/InternalOutputBuffer.java?only_with_tag=TOMCAT_5_0_12>
> ,
> > > TOMCAT_4_1_28
> > >
> <http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org
> /apache/coyote/http11/InternalOutputBuffer.java?only_with_tag=TOMCAT_4_1_28>
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Dirk
> > >
> > > Anna Fuhrmann wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hi all,
> > > >like  a good girl I have been using the user-mailing-list up to now to
> search for
> > > >user experience installing tomcat on os390.
> > > >
> > > >Most (if not all) contributions are in the form "has anyone
> successfully installed
> > > >tomcat on os390?" From some other I got partly valuable ideas.
> > > >
> > > >I have been TRYING to get tomcat run on os390 in the last couple of
> days.
> > > >Done everything I could - everything seems to be allright up to this
> pont: tomcat IS running at last
> > > >without any serious signs of disbehaviour - no error messages at all,
> xml's behaving well. But if we connect to
> > > >localhost:tomcatport/index.jsp  (or wahtever else for that matter), the
> browser does not show
> > > >anything. Doing the same with a perl script shows that the server is
> ansering and is supplying the
> > > >requested page, BUT EACH LINE OF THE HTTP_HEADER CONTAINS AN INVALID
> > > >(i.e.: ebcdic) LINE SEPARATOR. So thats the reason why.
> > > >
> > > >Today I tried to identify the .java-file giving us the header (looking
> for \r\n) . I thought I found it,
> > > >by my hex.editor did not show me any 0x0d15 (which ought to be the
> suspect, i.e. Newline
> > > >in ebcdic).
> > > >
> > > >What I would like to know: Is there any kind of patch for os/390? Do
> you have any suggestions?
> > > >Is anybody working on it? What should I do? I want to have this beast
> running.
> > > >
> > > >PLEASE.
> > > >
> > > >We have os390 2.10
> > > >IBM-JDK 1.3
> > > >tomcat 4.1.27
> > > >
> > > >Anna Fuhrmann
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> 
> This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the 
> intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and 
> CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
> distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in 
> error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this 
> message and any attachments.
> 
> In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the 
> Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as 
> social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and 
> passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.
> 
> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to