Jan Luehe wrote:
I think it depends on whether you anticipate (or support) LiteWebServer being bundled (as one or more libraries) into other products that use a different directory layout, with different locations for shared libs. If that's the case, limiting the location of shared libs to $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib might be too restrictive.
Your milage may wary, but no one embedding LiteWebServer (LWS) today has complained.
Of course nobody did ;-)
I have yet to see a webapp which doesn't have very visible TLDs, and when it doesn't, I don't think it would rely on possibly shared JARs which would contain the said TLDs.
This is clearly from the non-portable department.
I think sometimes too much flexibility is what makes a product hard to use. With LWS, I've stripped down Tomcat to the bare minimum and removed a lot of choices, and people seem to like how simple things get this way.
Obviously, useless choices should be removed.
Here, I'm ok with refining the feature a little bit (although it is probably not useful), but definitely not adding additional configuration options to it.
Remy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
