DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21219>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21219 Corrupted Message Body on interrupted GET ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-04 11:50 ------- Apache closes the connection on a 404 ? If the answer is always yes, then -0 for your patch (so I'm not vetoing, but I'm very close to that), otherwise, -1. I don't think we should always attempt to match the HTTPd behavior when we can do something which matches the spec and is more powerful. At least add a flag on the connector to allow configuring this (just like there's a flag to disconnect after a certain amount of requests). If the response has already been committed, I think your patch is ineffective, so is why I think it is a bad idea overall. There's also the fact that you're closing the connection without adding a Connection: close header (it's ok not to, but still ...). As I said in a previous comment, the only error we should detect in the HTTP layer is if the amount of data written doesn't match the content length. Right now, it is an error when less bytes are written, but if more are written, bytes are swallowed and the error flag is not set (which of course, is not a protocol violation). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]