Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
Like Remy, I'm -0 on the patch. As I read Remy's post, this means that
neither of us will actually veto it if some other developer decides to
post
it. However, neither of us consider it to be a-good-idea, so we will be
looking for implementation holes to veto ;-).
The internal Catalina API (e.g. org.apache.catalina.*) is pretty stable.
There are no current plans to change it.
It's not that I do think it's a bad idea, it's just I think there are
other problems. I would be willing to consider including the patch (but
I need to look into possible side effects first).
What could those side effects be???
Note: We're talking about 5.0.x here, I think. -1 for inclusion in 4.1.x.
I never thought for it to be in 4.1.x, and the patch is also based on
the catalina CVS HEAD yesterday.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
