----- Original Message ----- From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:47 PM Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20850] - POST is not defined in RFC 2068 and is not supported by the Servlet API
> Bill Barker wrote: > > I don't think that you've really read the stack-trace. This is happening > > well into the Servlet.service method, so Coyote has obviously read the > > method fine. > > Hmmm, I don't think so: service does the request name dispatching. > And the status returned is 501, not 500. > The read timeout may not occur on the same request. > > All in all, I'll leave to the reporter that he's sending valid requests. > I think the report is bogus :) Without more details from the reporter, I certainly wasn't going to investigate it further :). At first glance, it just looked to me like one of the (few) cases where disableUploadTimeout should be false. However, I can't explain why this should give a 501 instead of a 500. > > Remy > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
