For my book, I have been testing Tomcat with JRockit.
I tested on a Win2k / Linux dual boot box, so it has the advantage of
allowing to compare OSes :)
The result:
- on Windows, its performance was pretty much amazing (it *did* actually
beat IBM on Linux, which was previously making Windows look really bad).
- on Linux, it locks up the computer after a few requests and I have to
kill -9 all Java threads individually (why ?).
I don't think there's a problem with Tomcat which would cause that. For
the record, I was using RH 8 with the latest kernel patch (the one
Costin says is bad in his weblog ;-) ).
The main disadvantage of JRockit is its insane memory usage (basically,
it's 2* Sun Hotspot client; maybe there will be a use for those Athlon
64s even for small servers after all ;-) ).
The other result is that Tomcat on Linux appears to run more reliably
than Tomcat on Windows (except for the socket lingering "bug" that did
cause problems), as on Windows, with all VMs, a few connections are
rejected (while it never happens on Linux). I don't believe this
behavior is caused by a Tomcat bug.
Any comments, or anyone able to reproduce this ?
Remy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Tomcat Nino, Ricky
- Re: Tomcat Kief Morris
- [5.0] Running with JRE Remy Maucherat
- Re: [5.0] Running with JRE jean-frederic clere
- RE: [5.0.1-dev] Testing with JRockit 8 Remy Maucherat
- RE: [5.0.1-dev] Testing with JRockit 8 John Trollinger
- Re: [5.0.1-dev] Testing with JRockit ... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [5.0.1-dev] Testing with JRockit 8 Peter Lin
- Tomcat Matthew Mamet
- RE: Tomcat Benson Margulies
- RE: Tomcat Matthew Mamet