True, that might be a better design but my motivation was for a quick fix with minimal impact to the design.

On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 01:25 PM, Glenn Nielsen wrote:

A better solution might be to have a Store which can use a JNDI named
DataSource. Then let the DataSource worry about connection pooling, etc.

Glenn

Tom Anderson wrote:
<insert newbie disclaimers here>
I have been trying to use the JDBCStore stuff and found it to be a little unstable especially when the database connections have problems (or when the database is bounced). So, I decided to make some modifications that would allow it to drop connections on SQLExceptions and maintain a small connection pool (LinkedList of Connections).
Should I post the patch to this forum?
~Tom

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to