(This question is for Costin)
As I've mentioned before, I'm writing a new mapper to replace the
current 5.0 request mapper, which is a major performance problem right now.
The implementation goes well enough (I'll likely commit something today
or tomorrow; in the end, there are no fancy algorithms involved), but
there's the problem of keeping the mapper structure in sync with
Catalina's structure.
To do that, I was planning to use a simple MBean registration listener
(as all the components we're interested in register with JMX) with the
MBean server. (I can only see a way of doing that using JMX 1.2)
So, is it ok to do that ? Is there a better way (I don't want to use the
Catalina listeners, obviously) ?
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [ANN] Security update: Apache Tomcat 3.3.1a released Larry Isaacs
- Re: [ANN] Security update: Apache Tomcat 3.3.1a r... Bill Barker
- [4.1.20] Tagging soon ? Remy Maucherat
- Re: [4.1.20] Tagging soon ? Hans Bergsten
- Re: [4.1.20] Tagging soon ? Glenn Nielsen
- Re: [4.1.20] Tagging soon ? Glenn Nielsen
- Re: [4.1.20] Tagging soon ? Jeanfrancois Arcand
- Re: [4.1.20] Tagging soon ? Remy Maucherat
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Remy Maucherat
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Costin Manolache
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Remy Maucherat
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Costin Manolache
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Remy Maucherat
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Costin Manolache
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Remy Maucherat
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Costin Manolache
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Remy Maucherat
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Costin Manolache
- Re: [5.0] New mapper Remy Maucherat