Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >>If PureTLS isn't compatible with IBM JVM, then fine, but I can't see
> >>its usefulness.
> > It shouldn't be incompatible. What's going on here is a provider
> > conflict.
>
> > You need to ensure that Cryptix is ahead of whatever IBM provider you
> > ahve installed.
>
> That is possible, I didn't think of setting Cryptix as endorsed. I did
> try it with PureTLS, though.
PureTLS needs Cryptix.
> I had similar problem with JSSE and the IBM VM.
Java crypto support could be a lot better.
-Ekr
--
[Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://www.rtfm.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
