The problem with this bug is that there are people here who don't agree it is a bug... which is just plain ignorant and stupid... THIS IS A BUG....IT NEEDS FIXING!
I've tried get this one sorted as well... however, either someone will tell you they don't agree it is a bug and/or they will just ignore you until you go away. Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: Donald Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 19 December 2002 15:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Fwd: error-page status codes broken, no response to > bugzilla report > > > What does one have to do to get a response to a bug report > around here? I submitted it to bugzilla, I followed up here. > If it's a bug, I'm happy to help patch. If I'm an idiot, I'd > appreciate being told so. > > - donald > > On 12/18/2002 at 1:00 PM Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I submitted this bug report a few days ago: > > > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15406 > > > >It seems to me that tomcat is doing the wrong thing when it tags the > >error page contents with status code 200 instead of the actual error > >status > code. > >If this is the case, is anyone interested in fixing tomcat? > If this is > >not the case, can someone try to explain why tomcat's behavior is > >correct? > > > >- donald > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:tomcat-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
