In the RELEASE-NOTES I saw that changes are ordered chronologically. [4.1.1] bla [4.1.2] bla [4.1.3] bla [4.1.4] bla
Isn't more usefull to have the last changes in the top of each list ??? [4.1.16] bla [4.1.15] bla [4.1.14] bla [4.1.13] bla It's just an opinion ( mine ;-) ). Arnaud H. > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoye : mardi 26 novembre 2002 23:32 > A : Tomcat Developers List; Tomcat Users List > Objet : [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Tomcat 4.1.16 Alpha released > > > Apache Tomcat 4.1.16 Alpha has just been released. Please > help improve > upcoming Tomcat releases by testing it. > > Note: This release is intended only for testing purposes, not for > production use. > > Downloads: > http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/ v4.1.16-alpha/ Significant changes over 4.1.15 Alpha include minor performance improvements and bugfixes. The full list of changes is available in the release notes. http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.16-alpha/ RELEASE-NOTES Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
