At 10:46 PM 10/16/2002 -0700, you wrote: > > There was also some comment about "other special issues", which has not > > been clear to me yet. > >It's not clear to me either :-) > >Maybe short notices like "I want to propose X as a commiter, does >anyone has any objection ?" - to avoid some of the unpleasant >things we had in the past. That's the only example I can think >of.
So, essentially, this is a vote for an "open ended", closed, decision on what the committers decide is covered by the vote? Seems to me that, if people are going to put in time to become a committer, and I am spending a lot of time right now familiarizing myself in order to begin to help, they ought to be in on these "unpleasant things" that may affect them. I appreciate that sometimes things are unpleasant. But, open source and closed discussions are not exactly in tune. That is especiallys so when the closed discussions are open-ended. Just my two "sense". I would suggest that you have the vote only on the issues that are articulated, and not on issues that will be articulated in private. Micael ------------------------------------------------------- This electronic mail transmission and any accompanying documents contain information belonging to the sender which may be confidential and legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom this electronic mail transmission was sent as indicated above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of the information contained in this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please delete the message. Thank you -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
