> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Gomez
>
> Even if I agree with using APR in JK 2.1, I think we should
> first focus on having a stable JK 2.0 before starting
> thinking about JK 2.1.
>
That's good one :).
I agree with that, but would like to make the load balancer to have a
timeout connection-recovery option, cause that's the only way to have
JK2 serve more then 5 concurent connections (depending on the system
performance), and to be 'stable' or even 'usable'. Just don't wish to
write the same thing twice...
> Branching now since premature.
>
Why?
MT.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
