Larry Isaacs wrote:
> Hi Henri,
> 
> I would prefer to minimize the impact of upgrading from
> 3.3.1 to 3.3.2.  I agree with Costin that using 4 with
> documentation on the steps to enable the MxInterceptor
> would be a resonable way to implement this.

So I'll have to take a look at MxInterceptor to see if
nothing is broken ...

BTW, I could spend sometimes to play ClassLoader,
making MxInterceptor loading mx4j/mx4-tools from
container ClassLoader but I need some advices.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to