Larry Isaacs wrote: > Hi Henri, > > I would prefer to minimize the impact of upgrading from > 3.3.1 to 3.3.2. I agree with Costin that using 4 with > documentation on the steps to enable the MxInterceptor > would be a resonable way to implement this.
So I'll have to take a look at MxInterceptor to see if nothing is broken ... BTW, I could spend sometimes to play ClassLoader, making MxInterceptor loading mx4j/mx4-tools from container ClassLoader but I need some advices. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>