Mladen Turk wrote: > One suggestion. > I would use the align="left" for most of the tables showing config or > console cause it would look much better, but that's my opinion.
Hum it seems to be a problem with IE, mozilla allready show it at left, I'll fix the xsl/css >>For those of you interested in seeing the jk documentation in >>progress just go to : >> >>http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jk_docs/ >> >>This documentation include jk and jk2 even if I'm focusing >>on jk to be ready for mod_jk 1.2.0 release >> > > > I'm focusing on jk2 2.0b (think I'll be the RM), so... He he ;) > 1. I'll try to write the example for jni, for both 'Configuration in the > Tomcat' and 'Configuration in the Web Server' > 2. Write the FAQ skeleton for mod_jk2 > 3. Write the IIS Howto skeleton for the jk2 (hope that Nacho will help) > > Do we need to separate those as two different docs, or make them as one? My goal for jk documentation was : put in common, things which will be common to jk and jk2, ie ajp protocols descriptions. put in jk, everything which is just mod jk 1.2.x related. I think the same thing should be done for jk 2.x. Question should we share the docs developped for jk ? The general idea will be to have a general part, and then jk and jk2 specifics. For example NES,IIS,DOM,APACHE seems good candidate. The presentation is the same, the build should be similar (just have to mark diff between jk and jk2). Configuration is where will be real differences. Ideas and comments are welcomed -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
