hgomez      2002/09/02 03:51:10

  Modified:    jk/xdocs index.xml
  Log:
  Updated index.xml, more informations on jk/jk2
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.4       +55 -18    jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/index.xml
  
  Index: index.xml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/index.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.3
  retrieving revision 1.4
  diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
  --- index.xml 30 Jun 2002 03:32:01 -0000      1.3
  +++ index.xml 2 Sep 2002 10:51:09 -0000       1.4
  @@ -1,31 +1,68 @@
   <?xml version="1.0"?>
  -<!-- edited with XML Spy v4.2 U (http://www.xmlspy.com) by Ba-k (ZonaWarez.com) -->
   <document>
   <properties>
   <title>Overview</title>
   <author email="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Jean-Frederic Clere</author>
   </properties>
  -<section name="What is the mod_jk Module">
  +<section name="What's mod_jk ?">
   <p>
  -<b>mod_jk2</b> is originated back to the old <b>mod_jserv</b>.
  -      <b>mod_jk2</b> is a rewrite of <b>mod_jk</b>.
  -      The native part has been completly
  -      restructured and the configuration has been simplified a lot.
  -    </p>
  +<b>mod_jk</b> is a replacement to the elderly mod_jserv. 
  +It was a completely new Tomcat-Apache plug-in that handles the communication 
between Tomcat and Apache.
  +</p>
  +<p>
  +The newest <b>mod_jk2</b> is a rewrite of <b>mod_jk</b>.
  +The native part has been completly
  +restructured and the configuration has been simplified a lot.
  +</p>
  +</section>
  +
  +<section name="Why should I use the mod_jk's Modules ?">
  +<p>
  +Several reasons:
  +<ul>
  +<li>
  +mod_jserv was too complex. Because it was ported from Apache/JServ, it brought with 
it lots of JServ specific bits that aren't needed by Apache.
  +</li>
  +<li>
  +mod_jserv supported only Apache. Tomcat supports many web servers through a 
compatibility layer named the jk library. 
  +Supporting two different modes of work became problematic in terms of support, 
documentation and bug fixes. 
  +mod_jk should fix that.
  +The layered approach provided by the jk library makes it easier to support both 
Apache1.3.x and Apache2.xx.
  +</li>
  +<li>
  +Better support for SSL. mod_jserv couldn't reliably identify whether a request was 
made via HTTP or HTTPS. mod_jk can, using the newer Ajpv13 protocol.
  +</li>
  +<li>
  +mod_jk offers a lot of different and flexible communications between a Web Server 
  +and the Tomcat Servlet Engine and could be used today by all of the ASF Tomcat 
Engine, 
  +3.2.x, 3.3.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x and 5.x
  +</li>
  +</ul>
  +</p>
   </section>
  -<section name="Why should I use the mod_jk2 Module?">
  +
  +<section name="What's the difference between mod_jk and mod_jk2 modules ?">
   <p>
  -      Because it offers a lot of different and flexible communications
  -      between a Web Server and the Tomcat Servlet Engine. 
  -    </p>
  -<!-- Pier's mod_webapp text we need our building.xml
  -    <p>
  -      If instead you're an adventurous geek who's up for a challenge, skip
  -      the rest of this document and go to the <a href="building.xml"/>
  -      section, there's where the fun starts.
  -    </p>
  - -->
  +mod_jk2 is a full rewrite of mod_jk and is much more powerfull
  +
  +<ul>
  +<li>
  +Even if it works with Apache 1.3, mod_jk2 has been developed with Apache 2.0 in 
mind,
  +and sus is better suited for multi-threaded servers.
  +</li>
  +<li>
  +mod_jk2 has a better separation between protocol and physical layer.
  +As such mod_jk2 add support to the fast unix-socket, and could be extended to 
support others communications
  +channels. More it's better suited for JNI and JDK 1.4 fast IO APIs</li>
  +<li>
  +mod_jk2 could be monitored via special URLs
  +</li>
  +</ul>
  +</p>
  +<br/>
   </section>
  +
  +
   <section name="Are there alternative ways to connect Apache and Tomcat?">
   <p>
         The alternative ways are better described in <b>mod_webapp</b>
  
  
  

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to