> A desire to do this in the first place probably > comes from wanting to use > unpackaged classes without importing them -- which > is both against the JSP > spec and is also frowned on in general by the Java > compiler in JDK 1.4 and > later. You're MUCH better off putting your classes
No, I want this because I need it to debug my generated class file at runtime. Currently, jasper will always generate class in org.apache.jsp. For example, /abc/test.jsp will have class in $scratchDir/abc, and /abc/def/test.jsp will be generated in $scratchDir/abc/def, with the same package - org.apache.jsp! I can not even compile these classes, do you think it a good design? Or, what I need is compile and debug, I do not need that flexibility to specify package name, at least, I think jasper should support this: these jsps will have package name org.apache.jsp.abc and org.apache.jsp.abc.def respectively. Yunfeng Hou _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 新鲜到底,娱乐到家 - 雅虎推出免费娱乐电子周报! http://cn.ent.yahoo.com/newsletter/index.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
