Remy Maucherat wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> First, a simple vote about the version numbering scheme for Tomcat 5.0.
> I think the method used for Tomcat 4.1.x is working well and promotes 
> quality, although it certainly delayed the apprition of a stable build 
> of Tomcat 4.1.
> I propose keeping it for Tomcat 5.0.
> 
> <ballot>
> +1 [X] Tomcat 5 should use Tomcat 4.1 version numbering scheme and 
> release management
> -1 [ ] Tomcat 5 should use something else (to be decided later)
> </ballot>
> 
> Although Tomcat 5 is still far from being feature complete (and won't be 
> in stable form until the servlet & JSP specs ship, at the earliest), it 
> could make sense to start releasing test milestones. The build process 
> works, and the binary works (to some extent; of course, many features 
> are missing and many refactorings still need to be made).
> 
> The milestones will have a 5.0.x number, similar to the current 4.1.x 
> releases.
> 
> <ballot>
> +1 [ ] Start releasing milestones for Tomcat 5.0 on a regular basis soon
> -1 [X] No, later
> </ballot>
> 
> Remy
> 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen             [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder    |
MOREnet System Programming               |  * if iz ina coment.      |
Missouri Research and Education Network  |  */                       |
----------------------------------------------------------------------



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to