On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Amy Roh wrote:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:24:00 -0700
> From: Amy Roh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: catalina.mbeans package
>
> > On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> >
> > > Most of the time, you want MBeans to directly delegate attribute read
> and
> > > write operations to the corresponding component object. Sometimes,
> > > though, that is not possible (for example, when the component getter
> takes
> > > an actual object, and the MBean takes a string containing the MBean
> name).
> > > Thus, you can subclass the provided base ModelMBean class and override
> > > just the methods you care about -- everything else will pass through
> with
> > > no changes.
> >
> > Many classes are just extending BaseModelMBean and do nothing ( all those
> > with around 4k size :-).
>
> Yes. There're a few classes that need to be deleted since they're not
> getting used. Initially I added them to handle special cases and realized
> those objects don't need any special case stuff on the implementation.
> Looking at it quickly we don't use HttpConnectorMBean, HttpsConnectorMBean,
> LoaderMBean, LoggerMBean, ManagerMBean, RealmMBean, and ValveBaseMBean
> anymore.
>
> Should I delete them from both 4.0 and the new jakarta-tomcat-catalina or
> just the new repository?
>
If removing them is transparent (i.e. all you do is remove the special
class name in mbeans-descriptors.xml), I'd go ahead and remove them from
the 4.1 version as well.
> Thanks,
> Amy
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
