On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > At the moment, the servlet-mapping issue is somewhat of a red-herring, since > only 3.3.2-dev supports it (and even there, it is disabled by default). For > now, mod_jk(2) might as well assume that the physical jsp/vm file is there, > since Tomcat requires that it is. The real issue is that jk_map_to_storage
I'm beginning to doubt the spec can be implemented - I just can't find any reasonable way to deal with extensions mapping. Yes, I know tomcat doesn't implement it very well either. > I *really* don't like the idea of passing DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests to Tomcat, > since I tend to set up directories with only static content that only Apache > knows about. Sending them to Tomcat just gives me very many 404 errors, so Not all DIR_MAGIC_TYPE, only those that belong to a webapplication. And possibly based on some option to enable/disable this behavior. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
