"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Kin-Man Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Kin-Man Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: $ in JSP names
> >
> > I totally agree that the use of $ in a file name is a pain in the neck.
> > In fact, I don't see the need for appending a "$jsp" at all. Currently
> > we have the following mapping:
> >
> > jsp file name: foo.jsp
> > class name: foo$jsp
> > servelt file name: foo$jsp.java
> > class file name: foo$jsp.class
> >
> > I think it'd be perfectly OK to use the following mapping:
> >
> > jsp file name: foo.jsp
> > class name: foo
> > servelt file name: foo.java
> > class file name: foo.class
> >
>
I thought the reason for appending something ($jsp or _jsp) was to
prevent errors in the generated java files for jsp filenames that use
one of java's keywords - default.jsp or new.jsp.
-Arvind
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
