[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Remy: I just fixed one serious bug in jk2/java ( the one reported by > David Oxley ). I think we need a 4.1.7 for that ( and possibly other > bug fixes ). We are pretty close IMHO. > > Henri: what about tagging the workspace for mod_jk1 with 1.2.0, > and use the same naming convention as in 4.1.x. > > Nacho, Mladen: same thing for mod_jk2 - we should use the 'milestone' > style, and mod_jk2.0.0 will be the first tagged milestone. There is > no need for anything fancy - it's just an alpha release. > > I think we should try to synchronize a bit - and maybe tag jk1.2.0 > and jk2.0.0 at the same time with 4.1.7.
Ok. I'll see if there are some other critical fixes that are needed to 4.1.6. So far, I didn't get any report of serious problems (except DBCP issues; I'll update again to pick up the latest changes; Glenn, could you comment on that if you're around ?), so I'd say it looks good and I'll do the release (and I hope it will be beta worthy :-D). We'll have to go do a cleanup of Bugzilla someday. Many bugs there are not relevant to 4.1.x, though. I'll try to update the version of those which are confirmed or in need of a review to be to a 4.1.x number. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
