[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
>> That's why counts where not right on my side of the border... I don't recall
>> vetoing the proposal... I just complained vehemently that I'd prefer to see
>> 4.0 out of the door and stable rather than a 4.1 and a 5.0...
>
> 4.0 is out of door - the release happened long ago. So did 4.0.1... 4.0.4.
>
> 4.1 is getting close - and it should be more stable and better than 4.0.4.
> And 5.0 should be more stable and better than 4.1 and 3.3.
>
> And 6.0 will probably be better than 5.0.
>
> If you are interested in maintaining and improving 4.0.4 - just volunteer
> as release manager for the branch, you have my +1 on it.
I can't be a RM for 4.0.4 because I would simply remove 70% of the code, and
kiddies would start crying their butts off because they don't have the
manager application, or JSP support :)
But if anyone is interested I'd like to explore the opportunity of a
Tomcat-HA (high-availability or hard-edition), based on 4.0 without the
"crap" in there, and straightening out the request-response model...
Simply, take the Catalina classes, and remove piles of useless stuff (more
or less what Jon does for Scarab, but to a greater degree, maybe even
reimplementing some of the Standard* classes).
>> I can't veto as I don't really care how you want to spend your evenings and
>> stuff...
>
> I don't think you can 'veto' a long term plan or release. AFAIK it's
> a majority vote.
Veto in terms of -1ing it.
Pier
--
[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different
sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with
the readability of PostScript. [Jamie Zawinski - DNA Lounge - San Francisco]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
