DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9979>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9979

load-on=startup without explicit order doesn't work with jsp-file

           Summary: load-on=startup without explicit order doesn't work with
                    jsp-file
           Product: Tomcat 4
           Version: 4.0 Final
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Servlet & JSP API
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Following is part of a web.xml file to talk about.

  <servlet>
      <servlet-name>foo_jsp</servlet-name>
      <jsp-file>/foo.jsp</jsp-file>
      <load-on-startup></load-on-startup>
      <!-- Note there is no integer inside the tag above. -->
  </servlet>

The bug is that in this particular case - where there is no integer
inside the load-on-startup tag, the load-on-startup
has no effect. It does work if an integer (e.g. 1) is placed
inside the load-on-startup tag -- but the Servlet 2.2/2.3 spec
says that you don't need to specify number. It should work w/o
one. Note also, Servlets (as opposed to JSP's) do work fine
without a number. Just a problem with jsp's (from my testing).
This bug has an easy workaround, which is to always put a number,
but it's annoying if you have a lot of JSP's that you want to preload
and you have to add a number for all when you really don't care about
the order.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to