On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Bill Barker wrote:

> > Or the better way could be to copy CoyoteRequest code.
> > But there will be 3 copy of Accept-Language decoding
> > in TC 4.x, may be it should be placed elsewhere and
> > useable by HttpProcessor, CoyoteRequest and AJP13
> > (may be tomcat-util ?)
> 
> For Jk2, TC 4.x already is using a CoyoteRequest, so you should be fine.
> It's only the o.a.ajp connectors that need Accept-Language parsing.

Can we officially deprecate o.a.ajp ? 


Costin




> 
> > While looking at the code, it appears to be a waste
> > of time (and objects) to decode many of HTTP/headers
> > (ie Locales for possible future getLocales() call).
> 
> > Could we have sometime in the future a Coyote HTTP/1.1
> > and AJP13 connectors, which won't process any headers
> > or attributes before user or app want to.
> 
> This is hard to do with TC 4.x since you can't force a RequestWrapper to
> delegate to the wrapped Request.  o.a.c.c.ApplicationDispatcher is a good
> example of this.
> Regards
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to