On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > I'll adopt a hard line stance, since I think it is the only way to avoid > the situation with dependencies to get out of hand (where we bundle > custom builds of every dependent module). > > We have to use only release components in a release build. > If there are too many issues, then it is our fault for relying on broken > components, and those dependencies must be removed.
I agree that using only stable releases is the ideal solution. Except I don't think it scales. > > I'm not saying we should use HEAD, but the 'stable' branch of > > each component we depend on, where fixes are made. > > I don't agree, I'd like to use the latest stable version. I'd like that too. I just don't think it works. Well, let's close this issue - the release manager should do the build with whatever he likes, we vote on the end result. If you can get the stars to align on the release date and use only stable versions - great. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
