>+1 for mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.24. It's been running stable on my >systems for a really long time now. > >Not sure if the bug related to not picking up the index pages when used >with Apache 2.0.35 still exists... Anyone knows? > >To find the thread, search this list for this: 'Apache 2.0.35 >and mod_jk >1.2.0'. I've posted the question on 2002-04-07.
Hum, It's the bad error report when you specify a worker which didn't exist. I'm not sure if Costin fixed it... >Bojan > >On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 23:26, GOMEZ Henri wrote: >> Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ? >> >> If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot, >> and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there >> platforms. >> >> Regards >> >> - >> Henri Gomez ___[_]____ >> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) >> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... >> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
