On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > attribute somewhere :), but not found any reference to res or rc files > > there :(.. so I will stick at modiying jkant to suit my needs.. > > Wrong, they have an adapter for the rc.exe, so cpptasks already manage > resouces at least it seems.. > > It worth to try them? or continue modifying jkant? (i'm almost done )
I think cpptasks are pretty good, and the project has evolved a lot. They also seem to have a solid community, the licence is fine, and the code is not bad. For now we should stick with jkant, as it's stable and we can fix the bugs quickly. But long term we should probably merge the few tasks they don't support yet ( gcj and the netware), help them fix the bugs and move on with cpptasks. It's on sourceforge, and is not invented here - but that shouldn't matter. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
