Hi, I'm just back from my week spent in finishing works in our new-house.
Could you wait up to the end of the week, to give me time to finish autoconf works (JNI). BTW, I'll need more informations on how to use JNI use stuff in apache 1.3 and 2.0. We'll have also to comment the fact that at least under Linux there is need to update by hand LD_LIBRARY_PATH to have jni shared libs loaded .... - Henri Gomez ___[_]____ EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 1:35 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: M1 ? > > >On Fri, 31 May 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> I spent zero time working on the native parts of JK 2, so >obviously my >> opinion doesn't really count ;-) > >I'll count in the time you spent optimizing jasper :-), so >your opinions >matters. > > >> I think it's good to start releasing milestones. There's already a >> Connector:Coyote JK 2 category in the TC 4 BZ which could be >used for that. >> Is that good enough ? > >I think so. > >> So with 4.1.x, what should be the recommended connector ? >mod_jk1 or mod_jk2 > >mod_jk1 is the stable one, and that should be used and recommended for >now. > >The java code will work with any mod_jk, so it doesn't matter too much, >is just the configuration of apache that will be different. I already >started with the web.xml -> workers2.properties generators, >and I hope jk2 >config will be much more automated and simpler. > >But for now - don't hold 4.1.x releases on mod_jk2. > >Costin > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
