Remy Maucherat wrote: >>Implementing the SingleThreadedServlet interface will not help thi >> > >Are you sure ? >(I didn't look at the code at all, so I'm just wondering) >Otherwise, it would be a really cheap way to make it work. > >Thanks for looking into it anyway. > >
Implementing SingleThreadedServlet doesn't mean only one thread will be running the servlet at a time. It means only one thread will be running a given INSTANCE of the servlet. So you could still have two threads running two different instances of the same servlet. This will still get massively messed up with all the sharing of static variables. >>Are the two authors still mantaining this code? Bip Thelin? Amy Roh? >> >> > >Not really. I didn't hear about Bip for a while, and Amy has been busy with >other things. >Usually an easy way to get commit access if you have time to dedicate to >contributing is to take over the maintenance of some abandoned component(s). >CGI also needs a maintainer, BTW. > >Remy > I'll fix this problem, and I'll create a filter that does SSI on any output ( so that a JSP page can use SSI, for example ). I don't have any interest in being a maintainer/having commit access, however. So what's the best way to give back my bug fixes/filter? Thanks for the response, btw. -Dan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
