On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > However I do think we should somehow document better what's > > happening - many people have the strange impression that > > webapp is going to replace jk. > > I'd like to find a way to indicate that the two preferred connectors are: > - Coyote HTTP/1.1 > - Coyote JK 2 (AJP with mod_jk, JNI)
And to clearly indicate that for whatever OS Pier is using and Apache2, users can also use mod_webapp. ( for 3.3 we do the same for mod_jserv and Apache1.3 ). Note that mod_jk2 is not and will not be ready for 4.1, and JNI doesn't work with 4.x in mod_jk1. PROPOSAL: Rename Coyote-jk2 -> coyote-jk. Or just drop the coyote-jk and coyote-http from documentations, no need to confuse users. There is the "coyote" connector, it supports http/1.1 and mod_jk. The current stable release of mod_jk is mod_jk1.5, the alpha/beta release is mod_jk2. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
