> Another (non-committer) +1 for keeping MinTC on tomcat-dev. > Having a (perhaps limited) web/servlet server in a jar is a great idea. > If Catalina core, migrates to allow this without a MinTC, other than a > special server.xml, then that's OK. MinTC will probably have served > it's purpose, and will die having had an effect probably on the core.
> The only problem I see, is NOT discussing MinTC issues on tomcat-dev - > having two solutions for this problem is not a bad thing. I will veto this (or vote against, if it's a majority vote). It has been very clear for a while that the Tomcat project has to provide one and only one servlet container for a particular version of the specifications. If the Tomcat project wants to provide MinTC, it has to be as a proposal for Tomcat 5. Note: MinTC is not the same as Catalina. It just happens to use the same interfaces. It is otherwise a completely different implementation. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
