It's not so much having one "util" jar, but understanding the differences between jakarta-tomcat-connectors' tomcat-util.jar and connectors_util.jar. If they are the same, then I would prefer to use a single name. Cheers, Larry
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 4/8/2002 6:37 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: > Hi Costin, > > I'm curious as to the reason to have connectors_util.jar instead > of just using the tomcat-utils.jar built by j-t-c/util? We have 2 'sets' of utils - one in j-t-c/util, one in j-t. We also have 2 lib dirs - lib/common and lib/container. The way we used to split the utils - we put minimal stuff in common, and that was core_utils and connector_utils. That's how 3.3.0/3.3.1 are doing it. I'm +1 to change to a single tomcat-util.jar in common, but that requires few fixes in xml-mapper ( actually in startup, to make xml-mapper find the thread loader pointing to container ). It also requires another review of the utils/ from security point of view - whatever is in common must be safe, since it'll be exposed to untrusted apps. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
msg24681/bin00000.bin
Description: application/ms-tnef
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
