GOMEZ Henri wrote: > Seems a good patch. > > Should be commited. > > BTW, Bernd could you make a little documentation which could > be included in jk doc and add example ? > > Excellent works ;)
Thanks, I'll have a look at the docs in detail and add some example. Should I sent these files to this list? Bernd > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_]____ > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Bernd Koecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:30 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: [PATCH] >>jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c,jk_util.c >> >> >>Hi, >> >>some days ago I sent a question for an only routing lb-worker. >>Costin asked for >>the patch and here it is. >> >>I added two config-directives for the lb-worker: >> >>local_worker >>- this is the name of the worker which should get the request >>if there is no >>session or no jvmRoute. >> >>fault_action >>- the possible values are 'balance' and 'reject'. Explanation follows. >> >>Behaviour of lb-worker: >>a.) there is a jvmRoute and the corresponding node is ok: >> -> The request goes to the corresponding node >> >>b.) there is no jvmRoute or the corresponding node didn't answered: >> -> if a local_worker was given. this one will get the request. >> -> if a local_worker was given, but it is in error state: >> fault_action == reject: the request gets an error. >> fault_action == balance: try to find another worker from >>the list of >> balanced workers (c.). >> -> if no local_worker was given, go directly to c.). >> >>c.) if no worker was found in a) and b) the normal balancing >>behaviour takes place. >> >>I looked at cvs-repopsitory and it seems that jk_lb_worker.c >>and jk_util.c have >>the same version (1.8, 1.12) like mine from >>jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.2-src.tar.gz. >> >>I need the fault_action, because our load balancer should not >>route a request to >>a node without a working local tomcat. So it is an error if an >>unrouteable >>request arrives at a node without a working local tomcat. And >>it is also an >>error to route it to one of the other nodes, because sometimes >>we switch off one >>node only by telling the load balancer not to use it for >>requests. In this case >>the modules should use this node only for requests with a >>session on it and not >>for requests without a session. But for other use cases it >>might be useful if >>mod_jk tries to balance the request in case of a failure of >>the local tomcat. >> >>I hope it is useful. Sorry i haven't looked into jk2 at this >>time, but may be i >>get time to do it soon. >> >>Bernd >>-- >>Dipl.-Inform. Bernd Koecke >>UNIX-Entwicklung >>Schlund+Partner AG >>Fon: +49-721-91374-0 >>E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Dipl.-Inform. Bernd Koecke UNIX-Entwicklung Schlund+Partner AG Fon: +49-721-91374-0 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
